Site icon Ethics and Climate

Three Videos on Why the Fossil Fuel Funded Climate Change Disinformation Campaign Is Neither an Exercise of Free Speech nor Responsible Scientific Skepticism and Should Be Understood as Some Kind of New Crime Against Humanity

 

 

This post identifies three updated 15 minute videos which have previously appeared on this site.  These videos describe, analyze, and respond to controversies about the climate change disinformation campaign. They include descriptions of:

(1) The enormous damage to the world that has been caused by a mostly fossil fuel corporate funded disinformation campaign on climate change,

(2) What is meant by the climate change disinformation campaign, a phenomenon sociologist describe as a “countermovement,”

(3) The tactics of the disinformation campaign,

(4) An explanation of why the tactics of the campaign cannot be excused either as an exercise in free speech or as responsible scientific skepticism,

(5) What norms should guide responsible scientific skepticism about climate change.

The videos end with a question about whether this campaign should be understood as some new kind of crime against humanity.
The videos are:

Why the Fossil Fuel Companies Funded Climate Change Disinformation Campaign is So Ethically Abhorrent


The Climate Change Disinformation Campaign, Part  2 Abhorrent Tactics,

The Climate Change Disinformation Campaign, Part 3, Exploration of Tactics Continued, Is this Campaign Simply an Exercise of Free Speech , If Responsible Skepticism Should Be Encouraged, What Ethical Norms Should Guide It?

 

By:

Donald A. Brown

Scholar In Residence and Professor

Sustainability Ethics and Law

Widener University Commonwealth Law School

dabrown57@grmail,com

Exit mobile version